Archive
Incident teardowns, detection engineering, reverse engineering and network forensics. Filtered to incident-response.
CL0P against MOVEit Transfer, worked as a case rather than read as news. A zero-day in an internet-facing file transfer product, a web shell, and a scope question that has nothing to do with how many hosts were touched. Nine questions, and the answers are in the advisory.
A trusted software update that carried a backdoor, worked as a case. Signing proved the build was the vendor's; it proved nothing about what was in it. Eight questions on detection, scope and the uncomfortable part, which is that nothing your endpoint controls were watching for was wrong.
A supplier is out €96,000 and the only endpoint that mattered was wiped on day one, by a helpdesk following the documented process correctly. Here is every artefact that still exists. Work out what you can prove, what you can only say is consistent, and the one collection change that would have moved the most from the second column to the first.
A full DFIR report on a constructed ransomware incident, written the way one gets handed to a board. Three hours twenty from first execution to encryption, four separate points where it could have been stopped, and the write-up that follows.
Issue one. A control that existed and had been disabled nine weeks earlier, a signup flow that failed silently for anyone behind a VPN, and the retention number that decides whether any of the rest matters.
